AI-powered Vehicle Search for General Motors

Reimagining vehicle discovery for the AI Era

Reimagining vehicle discovery for the AI Era

Reimagining vehicle discovery for the AI Era

Role

Lead Product Designer for the AI vehicle search work-stream

Team

4 product designers, 1 UX writer, 1 Researcher working on various sales/inventory features

Problem

How might we enable dealers to find vehicles using natural language and AI instead of complex filters to reduce time-to-discovery?

Solution

I designed an AI-powered discovery engine that replaces rigid filters with natural language search and real-time inventory intelligence

75%

Reduced search friction

30%

Search success rate

0

Training on-boarding

15 → 1

Search filters

75%

Reduced search friction

30%

Search success rate

0

Training on-boarding

15 → 1

Search filters

The challenge: When technical specs slow down sales

The challenge: When technical specs slow down sales

Dealership employees were bogged down by manual, rigid filtering systems that required knowing specific VINs or technical codes to find inventory. Based on direct dealer visits, we found that staff spent an average of 3–5 minutes just locating a specific vehicle configuration for a customer, leading to friction on the sales floor.

Dealership employees were bogged down by manual, rigid filtering systems that required knowing specific VINs or technical codes to find inventory. Based on direct dealer visits, we found that staff spent an average of 3–5 minutes just locating a specific vehicle configuration for a customer, leading to friction on the sales floor.

Image of legacy inventory search
Image of legacy inventory search
Image of legacy inventory search

Current-state search: A technical, form-heavy interface that required dealers to memorize specific VIN codes and manual configurations, often leading to 'Zero Result' errors when filters were mismatched.

Research & strategic discovery: Frustration in the Field

Research & strategic discovery: Frustration in the Field

My field visits to dealerships revealed that the legacy search wasn't just slow, it was a cognitive burden. Dealers were forced to recall complex codes and filters, making what should be a few second search into a complicated task of its own.

My field visits to dealerships revealed that the legacy search wasn't just slow, it was a cognitive burden. Dealers were forced to recall complex codes and filters, making what should be a few second search into a complicated task of its own.

Key findings:

Key findings:

The "impossible search"

Selecting mismatched filters often resulted in zero results, forcing dealers to memorize valid trim/package combinations.

The code barrier

Staff had to memorize technical trim/color codes and Model Year configurations just to perform basic tasks. This often led to them using customer-facing vehicle builders.

Workaround culture

Frustration was so high that dealers attended summits just to trade software workarounds and relied on 3rd-party Chrome extensions to fix GM’s missing logic.

Collage of images of dealer research
Collage of images of dealer research

Connecting with sales: Observing and interviewing dealers navigating legacy systems during an on-site visit to identify core workflow bottlenecks.

Design strategy: AI as a guide, not a takeover

Design strategy: AI as a guide, not a takeover

My goal was to move away from a reactive, code-based database and toward an anticipatory intelligence engine. A system where a dealer’s expertise is augmented, not hindered, by the software. The core of my strategy was to design the AI to act as a guardrail to assist the dealers with their search discovery.

My goal was to move away from a reactive, code-based database and toward an anticipatory intelligence engine. A system where a dealer’s expertise is augmented, not hindered, by the software. The core of my strategy was to design the AI to act as a guardrail to assist the dealers with their search discovery.

North Star

To reduce "Time-to-Vehicle" to near-zero by allowing dealers to speak to their inventory as naturally as they speak to their customers.

Tradeoffs: Search bar vs. Conversational bot

Early in the 0–1 process, I considered using a "Chatbot" interface or an AI "takeover" experience. While it felt "more AI," my competitive benchmarking and dealer visits suggested that in a high-pressure sales environment, a chat interface was too slow.


  • The Tradeoff: I sacrificed the "novelty" of a chat interface and "in-your-face" AI for a "Smart Search Bar" that felt seamless and baked into the flow.


  • The Result: This allowed dealers to keep their existing mental model of searching while gaining the power of NLP (Natural Language Processing). This also ensured that veteran dealers who know their specific codes could still use them.

Tradeoffs: Search bar vs. Conversational bot

Early in the 0–1 process, I considered using a "Chatbot" interface or an AI "takeover" experience. While it felt "more AI," my competitive benchmarking and dealer visits suggested that in a high-pressure sales environment, a chat interface was too slow.


  • The Tradeoff: I sacrificed the "novelty" of a chat interface and "in-your-face" AI for a "Smart Search Bar" that felt seamless and baked into the flow.


  • The Result: This allowed dealers to keep their existing mental model of searching while gaining the power of NLP (Natural Language Processing). This also ensured that veteran dealers who know their specific codes could still use them.

Diagram showing consolidated contract flow

Thinking outside the box: With search being both simple but vast, I started with low-fidelity wireframes to iterate quickly on the AI search interface without getting distracted by visual design.

Diagram showing consolidated contract flow
Diagram showing consolidated contract flow

Agentic vs. Assistive: An exploration of agentic UI patterns. While a fully autonomous 'agent' felt modern, I opted for an assistive token system to uphold user control, ensuring dealers could audit and override AI suggestions in real-time.

The solution: Intelligent discovery

The solution: Intelligent discovery

Natural language for inventory discovery
Easily query by customer needs (e.g., "Family SUVs under $50k with 3rd row") instead of memorizing technical trim codes. Smart filters time when with a customer to better tailor needs.

Natural language for inventory discovery
Easily query by customer needs (e.g., "Family SUVs under $50k with 3rd row") instead of memorizing technical trim codes. Smart filters time when with a customer to better tailor needs.

mockup of contract dashboard

Intelligent global search
Search is elastic throughout the application, showing AI suggestions and easy to access vehicle reports and information

Intelligent global search
Search is elastic throughout the application, showing AI suggestions and easy to access vehicle reports and information

Mockup of proposal details

Validated results summary
Global results surface hard data summaries directly from the database. At a glance dealers can quickly see results that span across categories. Summary text explicitly tells the dealer what is available and "on the lot," ensuring they never hit a dead end in front of a customer.

Validated results summary
Global results surface hard data summaries directly from the database. At a glance dealers can quickly see results that span across categories. Summary text explicitly tells the dealer what is available and "on the lot," ensuring they never hit a dead end in front of a customer.

Mockup of documents list in proposal

Projected impact

Projected impact

75%

Reduced search friction

30%

Search success rate

0

Training on-boarding

15 → 1

Search filters

Based on initial user testing of high-fidelity prototypes and industry benchmarks for AI-enabled automotive sales tools.

Based on initial user testing of high-fidelity prototypes and industry benchmarks for AI-enabled automotive sales tools.

75%

Reduced search friction

30%

Search success rate

0

Training on-boarding

15 → 1

Search filters

Key takeaways

Key takeaways

This project reinforced that impactful UX work is strategic work. It's understanding business constraints, user pain, and technical possibilities, then advocating for solutions that actually solve problems. While large, complex problems can feel insurmountable, the payoff is immense when you show users that someone is finally willing to step up, listen, and take action.

This project reinforced that impactful UX work is strategic work. It's understanding business constraints, user pain, and technical possibilities, then advocating for solutions that actually solve problems. While large, complex problems can feel insurmountable, the payoff is immense when you show users that someone is finally willing to step up, listen, and take action.

AI is an augmentation, not a replacement

The biggest win wasn't the AI's "smartness," but its ability to stay out of the way. By choosing a Hybrid UI (Smart Bar + Tokens) over a Chatbot, I respected the fast-paced nature of a sales floor.

Designing for trust and transparency

Trust is a UI component. Users need to feel in control of their actions and feel like the information they are receiving is concise and accurate. It was pertinent that search results didn't feel like a mystery.

Research matters at all stages

By pointing back to research insights and keeping up with AI research at all points of design made sure that at each stage of design was taking account for the way our dealers worked in the field day by day.

Navigating ambiguity

Designing for fluidity: AI results aren't static; they adapt to query complexity. I prioritized robust loading skeletons and empty states to maintain a seamless user experience.

AI is an augmentation, not a replacement

The biggest win wasn't the AI's "smartness," but its ability to stay out of the way. By choosing a Hybrid UI (Smart Bar + Tokens) over a Chatbot, I respected the fast-paced nature of a sales floor.

Designing for trust and transparency

Trust is a UI component. Users need to feel in control of their actions and feel like the information they are receiving is concise and accurate. It was pertinent that search results didn't feel like a mystery.

Research matters at all stages

By pointing back to research insights and keeping up with AI research at all points of design made sure that at each stage of design was taking account for the way our dealers worked in the field day by day.

Navigating ambiguity

Designing for fluidity: AI results aren't static; they adapt to query complexity. I prioritized robust loading skeletons and empty states to maintain a seamless user experience.

AI is an augmentation, not a replacement

The biggest win wasn't the AI's "smartness," but its ability to stay out of the way. By choosing a Hybrid UI (Smart Bar + Tokens) over a Chatbot, I respected the fast-paced nature of a sales floor.

Research matters at all stages

By pointing back to research insights and keeping up with AI research at all points of design made sure that at each stage of design was taking account for the way our dealers worked in the field day by day.

Designing for trust and transparency

Trust is a UI component. Users need to feel in control of their actions and feel like the information they are receiving is concise and accurate. It was pertinent that search results didn't feel like a mystery.

Navigating ambiguity

Designing for fluidity: AI results aren't static; they adapt to query complexity. I prioritized robust loading skeletons and empty states to maintain a seamless user experience.